State Appointed Attorney's ....

Bringing Attention now to

:

           State Appointed Attorneys, 
                                                     of which, "We the People"
                                                                                             are given to represent and defend for us

            "Our BEST  Interests".         

                                                             Let Us look closer at this also.                  

            Defendant, as a single person, was (under the Law) The Public.” (Personally, I have never seen nor

            heard of any Person including but not limited to “Jesus Christ” who has aspired to

            great heights, of Single Handley becoming, “The Public.”)

            The defendant is a Person,       Not a People.                

                                                                                             “The People is the Public”. 

 

            Now according to “The Law” the way “We The People” see it.

           A Public Defender is Not a Private or a Personal Attorney. 

           He is What the Court said,

            He is, a “Public Defender,” A Defender of the Public,

            and as such, is an assistant to and for

            the District Attorney.

           Since, the district attorney is an Attorney for the People,

           and the Public defender is an Attorney for the Public,

           then its clear that, is it not? They are One in the same. 

          Acting as We are ALL regardless of any facts, Guilty of our charges,

          Doing little to nothing to defend us as an individual, a Person (again, A person, not a People as People is Plural)

          Even so far as deciding with the District Attorney to remove a larger majority of it's citizens and their Solvereign Citizen rights, and agree to their

           needs belonging in a penitentiary . 

         That makes them Penitentiary Dispatchers.

         That is, unless somebody went to school long enough to find a way to:

         separate the “Public from the People.”

         But a Judge HAS Ruled that a Defendant, all by his self under the Law is the

         “Public.”  Well if that’s the case, the defendant will have to confess, that:

         “as a Patriotic Sovereign Citizen of The untied States,

         they are found also to be Guilty of Exposing themself to

       “The Public.”  

            As in saying if a Single Person (Not People) takes a shower the night before, coming to

            Court, and in so doing they Exposed themself to themself, and if it is true, that the  

            Defendant is (under the Law, all by His self) “The Public.” Then We find the  

            Defendant Guilty as Charged. 

            In this case, even the Judge must be Ridiculed.

            Right.     

                        Wrong!

            Our Government has a word they use to define all of its Citizens who have

            not been Taught the Laws which have been made Mandatory that “We Obey.” 

           

            Since Our Governments policy’s are to keep “We the People,” so ignorant about

            the laws that We can’t properly be called Sovereign Citizens.

            Our government therefore refers to “We the People” as “Laymen’s.”